Whats your view?

So I'm sitting here drawing, going through some inspiring pictures and trying to get some ideas going. I click on the Collections tab and lord behold what do I see? A collection of nothing but vagina shots from some low life POS who needs to get the hell off this site. From there I go to the next page to maybe see if there is some worth wile collections that people actually put time in putting together. I couldn't find a single page that didn't have "artistic" nude collections.

This has gotten out of hand, with both The viewers AND the photographers taking these photos.

ONE: This is not a porn site, as some of these photos go beyond "bold"(as some people try to defend it as) into simply, light porn.

TWO: Since some of these pictures are bluntly not artistic at all, I'm going to be blunt. This is not a MySpace for you to post the sluts and her friend that you took pictures of before you fucked them. Sorry, Suck it up. I cussed and referred to some women as "sluts", get over it.

THREE: So the viewers see it as artistic? then why do we have compilations of nothing but vagina, and boob shots with titles like "Ohh Yeah" or "sex and other kinky stuff" I don't have a problem with porn. hell ill admit that I watch and look at porn my self, Ill have the balls to say that. We DON'T need it here though, go to a porn site for fuck sake. Its not hard for a little teenager to turn off the filter and check out some woman's boobs or vagina. On top of that, I'm not a raging sex addict who loves to look at some provocative woman 24/7. When I'm on an art site, I'm here for art, and artistic vision, sharing my art, and helping others with there art, not porn.

FOUR: This is not a big issue for me but after being upset and running into it, I noticed. I think we all know that one certain popular Artistic Nude Photographer. Some times I really run into one of his shots that stop me and I go WOW, that's a good shot. But his most recent shot left me going WTF. I looked at it and I could not find a single thing artistic about it, in any way what so ever. It wasn't a real provocative shot or anything, but it had no artistic merit in it. after reading his comment on it, it seemed that it was just a photo that the photographer liked because he found the models smile to be nice before the actual shot. My point is, it wasn't set up, it didn't have the photographers emotions that he was trying to portray through a model. It wasn't even a random shot that happened to show great artistic value. it was simply what was stated, a nice shot, to the photographer. I'm sorry man =/..this is not photo bucket.

FIVE: There was a recent picture that was drawn, of a woman an.....

And so I sit here not saying anything because hes not gona care, cuz he gets naked woman to pose for him at his advanced age, and the mass of immature and brain washed people who will back him if I say anything. then ill probably get a ban from the flood of complaints about me to he staff.

have to go, this will be finished later